Unfair, lying, tendentious, incompetent - Mdinaradze on the conclusion of the Venice Commission

Mamuka Mdinaradze, the leader of "Georgian Dream", called the conclusion of the Venice Commission regarding the wiretapping law unfair and a lie.

Mdinaradze says that there are no legal arguments in the conclusion. In his own words, it is a lie that the law was considered hastily.

According to Mdinaradze's assessment, the conclusion is tendentious and incompetent, he says that "in the worst case it has a basis, in the best case it is a mistake". The leader of the management team mentions that he does not believe in a good option.

"I don't think at all that they didn't have information. I think that we should leave this strangeness at the level of this assessment and it is not accidental. It will be bad if this happens, after a few months we may remember why such an authoritative body was so inclined: when It talks about arguments and has no arguments, when he talks about acceleration and it was not in an accelerated manner, that means that it is a lie when it points to the link on the law of wiretapping and you open the link and it speaks about the law of the court. Why was such an incompetent or tendentious conclusion - In the worst case scenario there is a concrete basis for this, best case scenario it is a mistake, but I don't believe in the former," said Mamuka Mdinaradze.